The
title quote, from a decades-old Bufferin commercial, captures a situation in
which the solution to one problem (headache) causes another (aspirin-induced
stomach irritation). The reality is that
similar dilemmas arise frequently in the world of behavioral problems including
addictions, though there is never a shortage of people offering black-or-white
advice.
It’s
usually quite burdensome to be dealing with an actively alcoholic family
member. Aside from the scars that the
experience tends to leave on children (who grow up to become ACOAs, Adult
Children of Alcoholics), for adults involved there are the unending demands to
manage and navigate a situation characterized by irrational and sometimes
unpredictable behavior.
The
term “enabling” refers to anything that other family members (usually most
focally the spouse) do that shield the alcoholic (or addict, of course) from
the naturally flowing consequences of his or her behavior. This concept took off around the 1960s (by my
recollection), and treatment providers urged family members to avoid enabling,
since it tended to prolong the alcoholism by preventing the alcoholic from “hitting
bottom.” True enough, and generally a
good idea, but at the time it was particularly hard for wives of male alcoholics
(many of whom did not have their own income) to step out of their enabling
roles, since it might well mean not having the means to keep the family fed and
sheltered. In real life, most decisions
are not black and white.
In
recent years, I have often found myself addressing the dilemmas and emotional
pain faced by parents and (grown) children of alcoholics/addicts. Take, for example, the parents of a
20-something young adult addicted to opiates (usually a combination of heroin
and painkillers). If they continue, as
is their natural inclination, to provide financial subsidies to their child, they
may be “enabling” – it makes it that
much easier for the younger person to sustain the addictive behavior. At some point, the parents may really need to
withhold such support until their child is genuinely in treatment and on a path
toward recovery. On the other hand, they
also know that withdrawal of financial help could increase the likelihood of
their child’s being homeless, engaging in illegal activity to get the substance,
and becoming more socially marginalized.
It is one of life’s many no-win situations, and none of us is in a position
to judge those who confront it.
That story has not yet reached a conclusion. But I raise these examples to highlight the fact that life, even in cases of severe addiction, there is no one, clear answer. This is why, as a therapist, I join individuals and families in wrestling with their situations, and attempt to provide information, perspective, and emotional support, but I seldom give one-size-fits-all advice.